This whole notion of "Talent Acquisition" (TA) vs. "Recruiting" is fascinating to me. I'm surprised (and a bit disappointed in myself) that it's taken me so long to recognize and embrace the difference and understand the value of TA. The point of TA is to develop a longer term program, leveraging the employers' brand for the benefit of attracting talent. It's all about being attractive to the top performers in your business, because of the way you do business and the way you treat your employees.
When I ask candidates who they'd ideally like to work for, the frequency of the big, iconic, aspirational brands are often mentioned, Apple, Google, Disney, Facebook, Amazon . . . These brands attract talent . . . with a talent acquitistion strategy. This attraction doesn't "just happen", by accident.
Michael Homula does an excellent job of explaining the difference between recruiting and “talent acquisition”.
• Recruit (ing) - To enlist as a member of an armed service or to enlist the services of a person.
• Talent - A special often creative, artistic or mental gift.
• Acquisition - To gain possession of something as a result of effort or experience.
"So, from a candidate perspective which would you rather be? Someone who is getting "enlisted" to perform a "service" or someone who has a "special often creative, artistic or mental gift"? I think it is a no brainer but this deserves a bit more explanation. Recruiters look at prospects and candidates as a means to an end - filling the opening/requisition. Talent Acquisition professionals understand that each talent has something of value to offer.
Continue reading "Isn't "Talent Acquisition" The Same As "Recruiting"?" »